Martes, Mayo 22, 2012


COMMUNISM IN THE HERE-AND-NOW
By Mauro Gia Samonte

FOREWORD

At the infancy of my involvement in proletarian politics, it had become common among activists to talk about communism as a social system to be brought about only through the establishment of the dictatorship of the proletariat. It was preached that this dictatorship, being ruled by the selfless working class, would bring about the abolition of private property, hence the abolition of classes. And when there would be no more classes, there would no longer be a need for the state as an instrument of class oppression. The state would then wither away, thus bringing about the establishment of communism, a social system of self-governing humanity moved by pure love, justice, peace and brotherhood in their interrelationship with one another and with nature.

Read More
            And so it was that in 1971, after an initial hands-on learning of capitalist oppression and exploitation and then meeting up with its instrumentality of state fascism in the strike of our newly-organized union, I immersed myself deeply into the proletarian sector of the so-called national democratic movement in the Philippines, taking up armed struggle. As to the legal fight of the union, it became completely subsumed to the classic admonition by Karl Marx: “Force is the midwife of every old society pregnant with a new one.” By this it was taught that the class antagonism between the workers and capitalists was irreconcilable and therefore their dispute cannot be resolved except through force. Besides, as Marx would be quoted endlessly, “The proletariat can no longer liberate itself without at the same time liberating the whole of society.” That liberation cannot be a function of one union’s legal strike but of, in the Philippines in that period, the national democratic revolution struggling to overthrow “US imperialism, feudalism and bureaucrat capitalism.”

            It was good while it lasted. From the declaration of Martial Law in 1972 all the way to the upheavals of 1986, the movement had evidently grown so that on the eve of the so-called EDSA People Power Revolt, the national democratic revolution was boasting of a revolutionary party, the Communist Party of the Philippines (CPP), spread across the nation on commission level; an army, the New People’s Army (NPA), of 25,000 regulars all in company formations; guerrilla fronts nationwide many of which already priding in having developed into cells called “armed independent regimes” of the National Democratic Front (NDF); and people’s militia numbering hundreds of thousands.

On the scale of war, the revolution had gone beyond strategic stalemate, having reached what the CPP Military Commission described as an advance sub-stage called the strategic counter offensive (SCO). From that sub-stage, the NPA General Command was now embarking on a grand design to finally push the strategic offensive to victory.

            But then suddenly came the snap presidential election of 1985, the culmination of the Justice for Aquino, Justice for All movement ignited by the Ninoy Aquino assassination in 1983 and made to rage all over the country. Marcos won the count, but Cory cried “Cheat!” and at the tail of her civil disobedience campaign got the military staging a mutiny that led to the ouster of the dictator.

            The national democratic revolution, having boycotted the snap polls and thereby getting no credit at all for the downfall of Marcos, fell flat on its face while Cory soared to power.

            Not long after, the CPP was splintering into factions, each faction tugging along a section of the NPA. The army regulars were broken up into guerrilla formations again, as they were in the beginning.

            Now the CPP/NPA/NDF as well as their splinter groups, Revolutionary Proletarian Army (RPA), Alex Boncayao Brigade (ABB), and the Cordillera People’s Liberation Army) CPLA are pursuing a line of political settlement with the Philippine government.  Political settlement, of course, is a discreet term for, at worst, surrender to, or at best, accommodation into, bourgeois rule. 

            Where does that put the proletariat?

            Back to where just dreaming about communism is better than not having to dream at all.

Walang komento:

Mag-post ng isang Komento